Iscar

Share

Leaders-In background

Electric current often outperforms physical media in fine finishing operations. However, CNC machine shops considering electropolishing must be careful to ensure metal parts retain sufficient levels of stock.

According to Chicago-area service provider Able Electropolishing, this non-contact, fine-finishing process generally removes between 0.0005 and 0.001 inch of material. How much depends on a manufacturer’s goals, which might range from achieving a certain roughness average (Ra) value, a shiny finish, micro-burr removal, and/or passivation for improved resistance to corrosion, contaminants or fatigue. Manufacturers should also keep in mind that electropolishing material removal can be controlled to within 0.0001 to 0.0002 inch. Adding this range to machining tolerances can provide a general indication of how much stock to leave after machining

However, achieving the desired result requires thinking deeper than these general guidelines. Other considerations include:

Machining Specifications

Electropolishing service providers must understand which areas of a part require the most precision because electropolishing is an indiscriminate material remover. Racks of workpieces, positively charged to serve as anodes, are bathed in an electrolyte solution along with negatively charged cathodes. DC current flowing from anode to cathode draws minute fragments of material away from all part surfaces at once. Depending on geometry and other part characteristics, current density at any given point on the surface can vary. As a result, some areas of the rack-mounted parts can shed more material than others. Designing fixtures that ensure uniform current density and avoid leaving critical features undersized — the true art of electropolishing — requires pre-production sampling.

 

 

Material

Pre-production sampling is also critical for revealing how different alloy formulations react to the process. Alloys suitable for electropolishing include aluminum formulations, brass, copper materials, carbon steel, titanium, and nickel- and tungsten-based metals. Generally, alloys require removing more stock than non-alloys to achieve the desired result, but precise levels depend heavily on the specifics of the material formulation. For instance, a failed salt-spray corrosion-resistance test after sampling might lead a manufacturer to choose an alternative composition.  

A vegetable peeler blade before and after electropolishing.

Here is a vegetable peeler blade before and after electropolishing.

Desired Surface Characteristics

To say that electropolishing provides a “smooth, shiny surface” would be accurate, but it is important to distinguish between those two terms. Electropolishing’s effect on a part’s shininess, or brightness, is affected primarily by the material’s chromium-to-iron ratio. However, a part can appear shiny without being smooth. Ra, a common a measure of smoothness, is defined by the average distance between the microscopic peaks and valleys that constitute all surfaces. Electropolishing creates a leveling effect (thus reducing Ra and making the surface smoother) by shaving the peaks. The slower and more controlled the process, the smoother the resulting surface. However, not all shiny parts must be smooth. Manufacturers must be clear about their goals from the outset.

 

Stock Level Limits

Generally, the more stock removed, the better the results of electropolishing, but only to a certain point. Once a surface’s peaks have been shaved away, the current begins to cut into valleys as well. The surface begins to erode and become rougher rather than smoother.

What does this mean for CNC machine shops? The smoother the part is prior to finishing, the better the result that can be achieved with electropolishing For example, according to the 50-percent guideline in the chart above, 16 Ra is the best possible result with a part that has been machined to 32 Ra. If specifications call for 8 Ra, the part would have to be ground, or undergo some other finishing process, to achieve at least 16 Ra first.

Based on an article by Scott Potter, vice president of sales at Able Electropolishing Co.

Scientific Cutting Tools makes over 8,000 tools
IMCO
Sumitomo
GWS Tool Group
Ingersoll Cutting Tools
Horn USA
Iscar
Kyocera SGS
DN Solutions
To any Measurement Question there is an Answer
QualiChem Metalworking Fluids
Pat Mooney Saws

Related Content

Deburring

Ingersoll Rand Offers Two New Belt Sanders for Smooth Finishes

Ingersoll Rand’s 360-313 and 360-418 Pneumatic Belt Sanders work effectively on metal, plastic, fiberglass, wood and other materials.

Read More
Sponsored

How to Accelerate Robotic Deburring & Automated Material Removal

Pairing automation with air-driven motors that push cutting tool speeds up to 65,000 RPM with no duty cycle can dramatically improve throughput and improve finishing.

Read More
IMTS

Mastercam Software Improves Programming Flexibility

IMTS 2024: Mastercam introduces Mastercam 2025, with features including Mastercam Deburr for automated edge finishing, finish passes, mill-turn support for Y-axis turning and automatic license update notifications. 

Read More
Deburring

Trumpf Deburring Tool Provides Repeatable Accuracy

The TruTool TKA 1500 edge milling tool is now available with a new cutting mount and guide fence for increased applications and safety.

Read More

Read Next

What Is Electropolishing?

Able Electropolishing produced this video to explain the electropolishing process, which is used for microfinishing, fatigue life improvement and even deburring in cases where the part is too delicate for more forceful finishing methods.

Read More
Deburring

Understanding Electropolishing

Compared to other options for deburring high volumes of metal parts, this process is said to be particularly well suited for the smallest imperfections and most fragile workpieces.

Read More

Registration Now Open for the Precision Machining Technology Show (PMTS) 2025

The precision machining industry’s premier event returns to Cleveland, OH, April 1-3.   

Read More
Sumitomo