In the end, the best choice should be the system that costs the least overall, takes up the least time in company resources and maximizes your production output.
Les Rapchack
An Adanac blower system uses a high static pressure blower to dry parts on a high volume system where the parts are close and the system needs to be running constantly. The high static pressure allows for smaller air knives and stronger blow-off force. Here, energy saving was the predominant factor making this the best choice.
A Nex Flow compressed air operated air knife is used with a PLC controller (that Nex Flow also supplies) so that it operates only when the part is passing under the air knife. Space, reliability and maintenance issues were of prime importance as well as energy cost. With virtually zero maintenance, (stainless steel shim maintains the air gap as opposed to plastic), and operates less than 50 percent of the operation time by using the PLC, it is less costly to use than a blower system. The additional bonus was a low noise level.
Blow-off of water, dust, coolant, etc. is achieved by using either, or both, compressed air and blower operated systems. In the last 10 years, much was made about the high cost of energy using compressed air. This has created both claims and counter claims by suppliers of both blower operated technologies and compressed air amplifiers (which are flow amplifiers) as to which is the best to use. In fact, you sometimes see advertisements—some rather stretching the limits of accuracy—touting their particular method of energy use. Certainly, if one is using open jets and copper tubing, pipe with drilled holes, or open slots and compressed air for them—either blower blow-off systems or compressed air amplifying systems should be chosen instead as both with reduce energy costs and most likely improve the productivity of the operation.
Facts
It really just depends on situation. These are the facts that should be considered for any blow-off application when choosing blower systems or compressed air amplification systems. Each factor may have a greater or lesser weight over the other depending on the company and personnel involved. • Availability of particular energy • Space and weight • Noise level • Application particulars • Reliability • Energy cost • System cost • Maintenance and operating cost
Availability of Particular Energy
In some situations, the necessary electrical power may not be available, or the cost to bring the power to that location prohibitive. Depending on payback (one, two or more years) the cost needs to be considered over the project evaluation time. Similarly if compressed air is preferred (for other reasons to follow), the cost of installing a compressed air line needs to be considered. If there is no compressed air line at all, the cost of a new compressor may be significant. However, so can an electrical installation depending on the environment.
Space and Weight
Blower operated systems require far more space, and weigh far more than compressed air amplifiers. A blow operated air knife is larger and heavier than a compressed air unit. Space limitations can automatically discount the use of one technology over the other. It is not just the size of the particular technology. The blow-off force tends to be stronger with compressed air amplifiers by their nature when compared to many blower systems. This means the time to dry between one spot to the next may be shorter with a compressed air amplifier. This is simply because it blows off more. Blowers can add heat but also increase energy use, and can only add heat if the heat evaporation does not leave spots on the item being dried. (This is where it can get confusing because all the factors are so inter-related). In one situation, a company changed back and forth from compressed air to blowers because the blower system in that particular situation did reduce energy use, but the part did not dry very well. This caused other problems that added back the cost that was reduced elsewhere.
Noise Level
Blower systems can have silencers added to them but they are, just by their size, far more noisy than compressed air amplifier systems. Silencers of course may be added to blower systems but the cost again, goes up more. The tendency of compressed air amplification technology is to get intrinsically quieter as designs continue to improve to address noise levels.
Application Particulars
This is very critical. Applications where the blow-off must be continuous tend to favor blow-off systems above 12" lengths but, if the blow-off can be cycled on and off when needed, suddenly compressed air amplifier systems become much more economical. For example, if an item is on a conveyor, a compressed air-operated air amplifier air blade (air knife) may be cycled on and off only when the item is there to be dried. A blower-operated system on the other hand, is constantly running. If the requirement for drying is intermittent, it may actually use more energy than a compressed air system. Blower systems are typically running constantly. Also, there is a lower limit on the size of blowers to maintain the shear force you need for a blow-off. If the blow-off requirement is very light, blowers operating air blade (knife) systems under 12" may be economical, but often the lower horsepower they need may be quite marginal compared to what a 12" and under compressed air system uses. So the size of a system and constancy of blow-off required is important.
As mentioned before, the distance between points in a blow-off is important as to which technology is best. The available space is always important to consider. Blowers may have heated air but this adds to energy costs and the nature of the product being dried may not allow heat (such as a packaged meat product or even some metals which may have stains of the moisture which was evaporated off instead of just blown off).
Reliability
If the blower motor or the blower goes down, the line goes down in a blower-operated system. Spare parts become quite important in critical operations. Compressed air amplifier systems run off stored compressed air and are intrinsically more reliable as a result. There simply is no need for spare parts. If the application is critical, the method of blow-off tends to be compressed air systems especially for smaller size systems.
Energy Cost
Larger blower-operated systems that need to be constantly on are by far the most energy efficient. If measured strictly on energy savings, no one can argue that they are more energy efficient over compressed air amplification systems.
System Cost
Blower systems cost far more than compressed air amplifier systems simply because a blower is required. Larger systems may cost significantly more if a separate location is required for the blower to house (noise reduction). Spare parts for critical operations must also be considered. Economy depends on amortization time considered and expected maintenance costs. These expected maintenance costs should be carefully studied prior to any such system being bought.
Maintenance and Operation Cost
Compressed air-operated amplifier blow-off systems have no real maintenance cost as long as there is proper filtration for water and, if necessary, oil and that these filters have automatic drains. Compressed air amplifying units use small gaps to allow a small amount of compressed air to be used and their special designed profile and shape entrains ambient air, essentially converting pressure to flow, minimizing energy loss and reducing noise levels. They convert high pressure to low pressure and flow. The operating cost is the only energy used. They can go on and off as required using solenoid valves and pressure switches or other sensors so the actual energy use may be quite minimal in intermittent required applications. For blower-operated systems, the ongoing costs include energy and maintenance costs. These can vary dramatically with each application, the make, model and size of blower, and how hard the system has to work.
Consider All the Factors
In deciding on a blow-off or drying method, it is not just energy cost. One needs to consider all the various factors that can affect the production process. If high force is required, then either a more costly, noisy and expensive blower system may be needed (over a lower costs weaker blower system), or perhaps a lower cost compressed air amplifier system. It depends on what is important. All compressed air amplifier systems, despite the different makes, are not in most cases all that different in performance because the source is the same—stored compressed air, typically between 80 and 120 psig. However, blowers can vary quite a bit in performance depending on make and model. So can service and serviceability. Application requirement can also vary greatly. Just comparing energy use may not be accurate. Your production rates and output can be negatively affected if choosing the wrong system.
The best thing to do is to consider all the factors listed above. Certainly if initial cost and minimal space and/or noise are the major factors, compressed air systems tend to be the choice. If energy use is the most important criteria and maintenance costs are not relevant, blower systems are usually chosen. But is it the right choice? The best choice in the end should be the system that costs the least overall, takes up the least time in company resources, and maximizes your production output.
Les Rapchak is President for Nex Flow Air Products Corp. (Richmond Hill, ON). He can be reached toll free in the U.S. and Canada at (877) 797-2777, ext. 6 or internationally at (416) 410-1313, ext. 6.
Achieve higher metal removal rates and enhanced predictability with ISCAR’s advanced high-feed milling tools — optimized for today’s competitive global market.
.jpg;maxWidth=300;quality=90)
