White Paper Compares Cutting Methods for Complex Parts, Fabrication

Micro Waterjet (Huntersville, North Carolina) has published a white paper titled “Overcoming Quality & Precision Challenges in Cutting Applications,” detailing the strengths and weaknesses of wire EDM, laser, chemical etching, conventional waterjet and micro waterjet machining on various materials for complex parts. The paper is available as a .pdf at microwaterjet.com.

“Getting the right results the first time is what clients expect in this field,” says Steve Parette, managing director. “Understanding the possibilities and limitations of a cutting method before engaging a project is a vital first step in making sure that happens.”

According to the company, the paper is meant to address concerns from clients that had experienced failures or less-than-desirable results from other methods. “We’re definitely not saying Micro Waterjet is the ideal solution for every imaginable scenario,” says Parette, “but we do know there are situations where the accuracy of our process is the best solution.” As covered in the guide, some of those situations include machining delicate or soft materials such as rubber or silicone, or producing precision parts with minimal burr or post-production finishing as in aerospace, electronics and other highly sensitive equipment manufacturing operations.