Bar Pullers: A Lower-Capacity Alternative to Bar Feeders
For shops with limited space or funds, a bar puller may provide an effective and accessible way to automate a lathe.
Share
ECi Software Solutions, Inc.
Featured Content
View MoreDMG MORI - Cincinnati
Featured Content
View More​​​
Operating a lathe means turning barstock into parts. Bar feeders push (or feed) a bar of stock into the lathe until the bar has been fully utilized. Then the bar feeder continues to load bar after bar until the job is complete or the hopper is out of stock. However if only a single bar of stock is necessary, or a shop does not have the space or money for a bar feeder, a bar puller can be used to easily automate any CNC lathe or turning center.
Like a bar feeder, a bar puller can improve productivity by enabling CNC lathes to run unattended and permit operators to handle other tasks. Under the right conditions, bar pullers have a number of advantages. They are inexpensive (just hundreds of dollars) and can be easily fit to most CNC lathes.
They are also easy to set up and use, as no electrical interface with the machine tool control is required. The bar puller is engaged via a typical tool change. The two main variants of bar pullers are spring-loaded jaw-type pullers and air/coolant-actuated finger-type pullers. Spring-loaded pullers can have either manually adjustable jaws that slide over the stock, or rollers (which negate the need for manual adjustment). There are spring loaded pullers available as combination puller/cutters that can cut off a finished part before pulling more stock. Air/coolant-actuated pullers usually have three fingers with which to grip the barstock by the end. These fingers have hardened inserts to prevent wear.
Although bar pullers do not take up the floor space bar feeders do, a simple bar puller does not offer production capacity to a machine at the level a bar feeder does. The added stock capacity of a bar feeder is worth the cost and real estate in the case of a machine tasked with producing a massive lot of parts. The size and frequency of jobs will help determine which option is best.
This article originally appeared on imts.com. Bar puller image courtesy of Royal Products.
About the author: Stephen LaMarca is AMT’s manufacturing technology analyst. He has a background in physics and a passion for all things mechanical, namely automobiles, clocks and wristwatches.
Related Content
-
Four-Axis Horizontal Machining Doubles Shop’s Productivity
Horizontal four-axis machining enabled McKenzie CNC to cut operations and cycle times for its high-mix, high-repeat work — more than doubling its throughput.
-
Made in the USA - Season 1 Episode 2: The Automation Puzzle
There is a fundamental question we need to answer when we talk about automation: To what extent is automation an answer to the skilled workforce shortage, and to what extent is automation vs. Skilled labor the wrong comparison to make in the first place?
-
4 Steps to a Cobot Culture: How Thyssenkrupp Bilstein Has Answered Staffing Shortages With Economical Automation
Safe, economical automation using collaborative robots can transform a manufacturing facility and overcome staffing shortfalls, but it takes additional investment and a systemized approach to automation in order to realize this change.